Market Trends Bullish 7

COVID Vaccine Cut Heart Attack Risk by 37.7% in VA Study of 1M+ Veterans

A massive Veterans Affairs study of over one million veterans reveals the 2024-2025 COVID vaccine significantly reduces cardiovascular events, especially in older adults, offering healthcare systems a new preventive tool.

· 3 min read ·
Share

Key Takeaways

  • A massive Veterans Affairs study of over one million veterans reveals the 2024-2025 COVID vaccine significantly reduces cardiovascular events, especially in older adults, offering healthcare systems a new preventive tool.

Mentioned

2024-2025 COVID-19 Vaccine product U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs organization JAMA Internal Medicine journal Dr. Glenn Hirsch person Influenza Vaccine product

Key Intelligence

Key Facts

  1. 1The 2024–2025 COVID-19 vaccine was associated with a 37.7% reduction in COVID-related major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) over eight months.
  2. 2Veterans aged 75 and older saw a 50.7% decrease in risk.
  3. 3The study analyzed health records from over one million U.S. veterans who received both the COVID-19 and influenza vaccines between September and December 2024.
  4. 4Secondary analyses found even larger reductions in all-cause MACE, hospitalization, and death, suggesting protection may extend beyond COVID-linked heart issues.
  5. 5The study design controlled for healthy vaccinee bias by comparing individuals who received both vaccines to those who only got the flu vaccine.
  6. 6The research, published in JAMA Internal Medicine, was led by the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs.
Reduction in COVID-related MACE
37.7% over 8 months

Compared to flu-only vaccine group

The results were not overall surprising, since vaccines either prevent infection or reduce the severity of infection and subsequent inflammation, lowering the cardiovascular risk.

Dr. Glenn Hirsch Cardiologist, National Jewish Health

Commenting on VA study in JAMA Internal Medicine

Vaccine Cardiovascular Protection Outlook

Analysis

For healthcare providers and hospital systems managing cardiovascular disease, the latest VA data offers compelling evidence that the updated COVID vaccine does more than prevent infection—it actively reduces the risk of heart attacks and strokes. With chronic disease patients and the elderly seeing the greatest absolute benefit, integrating vaccination into cardiac care pathways could become a standard preventive measure.

A landmark study published in JAMA Internal Medicine on June 25, 2026, demonstrates that the 2024–2025 formulation of the COVID-19 vaccine significantly reduces the risk of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) among U.S. veterans. Analyzing health records from over one million veterans who received both the COVID-19 and influenza vaccines between September and December 2024, researchers at the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs found a 37.7% reduction in COVID-related MACE—comprising heart attack, stroke, hospitalization for heart failure, and cardiovascular death—over an eight-month follow-up period. The protective effect was most pronounced in those aged 75 and older, who experienced a striking 50.7% decrease in risk, and individuals with chronic health conditions saw greater absolute risk reductions compared to their healthier counterparts.

Department of Veterans Affairs found a 37.7% reduction in COVID-related MACE—comprising heart attack, stroke, hospitalization for heart failure, and cardiovascular death—over an eight-month follow-up period.

The study's design is particularly robust, addressing the longstanding 'healthy vaccinee bias' by restricting the comparator group to veterans who received only the influenza vaccine, thus ensuring both cohorts had similar health-seeking behaviors. Secondary analyses revealed even larger reductions in all-cause MACE, all-cause hospitalization, and all-cause death, suggesting the vaccine's benefits extend beyond preventing COVID-linked cardiac complications. These findings align with a growing body of evidence that vaccines against infectious diseases can dampen systemic inflammation—a key driver of cardiovascular events—by reducing the likelihood or severity of infection.

Dr. Glenn Hirsch, a cardiologist at National Jewish Health in Denver, contextualized the results, noting that they are 'not overall surprising' given that vaccination either blocks infection or mitigates its inflammatory consequences. Previous research has demonstrated that influenza vaccination alone can lower cardiovascular risk, and the COVID vaccines' mRNA technology may amplify this effect through transient immune activation that paradoxically entrenches long-term cardioprotection.

From a public health perspective, this study provides compelling ammunition for vaccination campaigns targeting populations at high cardiovascular risk—a group that overlaps substantially with those vulnerable to severe COVID-19. For healthcare systems, integrating COVID-19 vaccination into cardiac rehabilitation programs or routine visits for chronic disease management could yield substantial dividends in reducing costly cardiovascular events. The VA's integrated health system model, with its comprehensive electronic health records, offers a blueprint for other large care networks to monitor post-vaccination outcomes in real time.

What to Watch

The implications for vaccine policy are significant. While earlier COVID-19 vaccines were associated with rare myocarditis cases in younger males, this new evidence for net cardiovascular benefit in older, at-risk populations may shift the risk-benefit calculus for regulatory agencies and advisory committees. Booster recommendations could be tailored to emphasize cardiac protection alongside infection prevention, particularly for elderly and comorbid patients. Moreover, the all-cause mortality benefit hints at broader immunomodulatory effects worth investigating in dedicated outcomes trials.

However, generalizability remains a question. The veteran cohort is predominantly male, older, and has higher comorbidity burdens than the general population, though this also makes the results highly relevant for the demographic most vulnerable to MACE. Future research should examine whether the cardioprotective signal holds across diverse populations and with longer follow-up, and whether annual reformulations consistently reproduce these benefits. The study also raises the possibility of pursuing a formal cardiovascular indication for COVID-19 vaccines—a move that would require rigorous trial data but could transform vaccine uptake strategies. For now, the findings add a compelling new dimension to the already broad portfolio of benefits from up-to-date COVID-19 vaccination.

Cite This Page

"COVID Vaccine Cut Heart Attack Risk by 37.7% in VA Study of 1M+ Veterans." Healthcare Intelligence Brief, June 28, 2026. https://gethealthbrief.com/story/covid-vaccine-heart-risk-va-study-health

How we covered this story

Every story in our healthcare coverage is assembled from multiple primary sources, cross-referenced for factual consistency, and scored along three independent dimensions: sentiment, operational impact, and source-cluster confidence. Single-source rumors and unverifiable claims do not pass our editorial gate. When a story shows "Verified by N sources" with N≥2, the development is independently corroborated; when N=1, we mark it explicitly so readers can weigh the signal accordingly.

Impact scoring uses a 1-10 scale weighted toward regulatory, financial, and operational consequence rather than coverage volume. A topic that runs in every outlet but moves no real decisions ranks lower than a niche regulatory filing that reshapes how operators in the healthcare space have to behave. Read our full methodology for the scoring rubric, our glossary for term definitions, and our trends index for the longitudinal view across the beat.

Sources are only linked to a story once they clear our classification pipeline at a minimum 35 percent relevance threshold. According to that methodology, reviewed July 2026, this follows multi-source corroboration standards recommended by journalism research bodies such as the Reuters Institute for the Study of Journalism.

See something wrong in this story — a wrong fact, a broken source link, a misattributed entity? Report a data issue.