Oz Pushes Value-Based Care as Under 50% Use Medicare Wellness Exams

For health system leaders and health IT vendors, the CMS administrator's comments are a policy signal worth reading closely: the agency is doubling down on value-based care while keeping the door open for AI in clinical workflows. Oz's framing — that CMS should "pay a doctor to take care of you" rather than "to do something to you" — points toward continued expansion of risk-based contracts and the population-health, analytics, and patient-engagement tools they require. Meanwhile, the sub-50% Medicare wellness exam uptake exposes a preventive-care gap that telehealth and outreach platforms are positioned to close.

In a July 2026 interview at the Great American State Fair in Washington, D.C., Dr. Mehmet Oz — the television physician now serving as CMS Administrator — offered his clearest statement yet of the philosophy guiding the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services: the most expensive problem in American healthcare is not care itself but bad-quality care, and the fix is a combination of quality, value-based payment, and carefully deployed technology. The syndicated Fox News Digital story, published July 20–21 across Fox local affiliates, carried a headline promising a healthy retirement habit "that could make America $1 trillion richer." That trillion-dollar figure appears only in the headline and is not substantiated anywhere in the published excerpt, so it should be treated as promotional framing rather than an economic projection. The substance of Oz's remarks, by contrast, is a genuine policy signal.

“

The $1 trillion headline should be held at arm's length until a source substantiates the arithmetic, but the direction of travel is clear: CMS is signaling that prevention, quality, and value will define the next phase of Medicare policy.

Oz's central claim is that "the most expensive thing we do in healthcare is give bad quality care." His explanation is blunt and operational: you pay someone who is not qualified to do a bad job, then you pay again to fix that job, and then you pay a third time for all the downstream complications. This is the quality-cost argument in plain language — avoidable errors, preventable complications, and hospital readmissions are among the largest drivers of unnecessary Medicare spending. His stated focus at the agency is "quality, quality, quality," a phrase he extends beyond the clinic into disease prevention and healthy behaviors at home, such as preparing healthy meals.

The second pillar of Oz's framework is payment reform. His line that "we don't just pay a doctor to do something to you, we want to pay a doctor to take care of you" is as clean a distillation of the fee-for-service-to-value-based-care transition as a policymaker has offered. Because CMS is the largest payer in the United States — Medicare and Medicaid together account for roughly a third of national health expenditures — the agency's payment signals ripple through commercial insurers, hospital systems, and physician practices. Oz's remarks suggest continued, perhaps accelerated, expansion of accountable care organizations, bundled payments, and other risk-bearing arrangements that reward outcomes rather than volume.

Technology is the third leg. Oz framed new tools as a way to deliver care by "meeting you where you are," and he explicitly said he wants to "embrace AI, if used safely and correctly," alongside innovative medications and screening techniques. The hedge is important: this is an endorsement of AI's potential in clinical and administrative workflows conditioned on safety, accuracy, and trust — a signal to health IT vendors that adoption will be encouraged but governed. For companies building clinical decision support, ambient documentation, and risk-stratification tools, the message is that CMS sees AI as central to the value-based agenda, not separate from it.